Our Monarchy

The Sovereign is represented in Australia by the Governor-General who is appointed by the Sovereign on the advice of the Commonwealth Government Prime Minister. In each State there is a Governor who is similarly appointed but on the advice of the State Government Premier. Only the Sovereign can appoint or dismiss his representatives.

Day to day government is carried out at Commonwealth level through the House of Representatives (lower house) and the Senate (upper house). The leader of the democratically elected major political party is the Prime Minister. The Leader of His Majesty’s Opposition represents the main opposition. Parliamentary arrangements in the States varies but the same principles apply i.e. there is a governing party and an opposition party and also representatives of other political groups who have been elected.

All parliamentary or judicial business, at State or Commonwealth level is carried out in the Sovereign’s name. The system of constitutional (parliamentary) monarchy is always carried out in such a manner as this ensures that no political group can ever grasp absolute power. Politicians must take an Oath of Allegiance to the Sovereign and by so doing the politicians are confronted by the fact that there is a higher authority and that authority is in fact the people represented by the Sovereign. The very fact of the Sovereign’s existence - no matter where he may be - is guarantee of good order and governance.

The Sovereign embodies the sovereignty of the nation and delegates the day to day functioning of this to his Representative the Governor-General. The Sovereign represents every Australian citizen regardless and by ensuring that government, justice and law are all carried out in his (your) name, his existence ensures the continuance of government for the people and ultimately by the people through the legal requirement to hold regular elections.

The King is also Sovereign of other Realms and the larger of these are renowned for their upholding of the rule of law as originally conceived in England hundreds of years ago. New Zealand and Canada (and to a lesser extent the United Kingdom) are examples. It is important to realise though that each is entirely separate from the other. The King as Sovereign in Australia is not legally the same person as the King in Canada nor is he in his role as King of the United Kingdom.

It is a matter of interest that certain individuals and groups of individuals have suggested that governing ‘in the people’s name’ is to be preferred to that of ‘in the name of the King’. This is a ridiculous argument. ‘The Australian people’ is a body of millions of people of differing views on everything with no common purpose at all. To swear an oath to ‘the people’ has no rational sense. To swear an oath to an experienced, a-political and disinterested single monarch for the natural course of the monarch’s life makes much sense indeed.